Summary
Chiropractors make numerous claims about their ability to treat symptoms by a method called chiropractic subluxation (not to be confused with medical subluxation with is visible in x-rays). A group of chiropractors has shown that the work of chiropractors provides no benefit over physical therapy.
Commentary
Like homeopathic remedies (a rant for another day), many have suggested that sublaxation is ineffective. Simon Singh was sued for libel for writing an article highlighting the ineffectiveness of chiropractors (the UK has "interesting" libel laws).
However, Harriet Hall, of the Science-Based Medicine blog, suggests that the "death knell" of chiropractic may have been rung. It is one thing for members of a profession to be introspective; it is another for them systematically refute the entire basis of their own profession. In the study they published, the chiropractors used a standard method for establishing causation known as Hill's Criteria. The criteria show the possibility of a causal relationship; not that it definitely exists. Yet, subluxation fails to satisfy any of the criteria. Sounds pretty bad for a field that's existed for 114 years.
Meta
What other professions should apply similar systematic rigor to their claims?
See Also
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Interesting. I've always had a positive attitude toward physical therapy, but was somewhat leery about chiropractors...possibly because they call what they do medicine when it clearly isn't. But some people swear by them--and then have to return regularly for treatment, so it didn't seem to solve anything. If they called it therapy, it would make more sense.
Are you saying that chirpracty is ineffective? How disappointing, but not really surprising given that my mother thinks it's the bees knees.
Post a Comment
In addition to comments, please indicate any typographical errors or issues related to this post.
Or you can contact me in private.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.