Zeno's Paradox involves a race between a tortoise and Achilles that suggests that motion is an illusion.
Commentary
I remember when I was first introduced to this paradox in 8th grade; it was utterly puzzling (until I heard a solution). A simplified version goes something like this:
Achilles and the tortoise are having a 1000 paces race, but the tortoise has a head start of 800 paces (Achilles is much faster than the tortoise). As the tortoise inches forward, Achilles makes a plan.When viewed abstractly, the problem seems to show that nothing can ever pass anything else-- that is the motion is an illusion. Until the early 20th century, there wasn't really a way to handle this paradox appropriately. However, with the advent of infinite series, we can say that the reason Achilles does pass the tortoise is because if you add up all the little pieces (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 ...) you get 1 (which represents the total distance between Achilles and the tortoise).
First, he'll get to the halfway point (let's call it Bob) between himself and the tortoise. Of course, to get to Bob, Achilles realizes, he has to get to the halfway point between himself and Bob (let's call it Jane). And before he can consider anything else, he must first get to the halfway point between himself and Jane (called Sam). [...]
As Achilles continues to think through his plan, he realizes he can never even catch up to the tortoise, let alone win the race.
Fun fact: Zeno's paradoxes are considered some of the earliest examples of reductio ad absurdum, also known as proof by contradiction.
2 comments:
I thought that the reason why Achilles passed the tortoise is because "real world" solutions are never as perfect as theoretical solutions, and therefore .999999999 is "close enough" to 1.
@Matthew: The limit of the sequence as you approach infinity is 1. It's not that a number is "close enough" to another number; it's that in the limit it is that number (for any bounded amount of precision you specify).
In general, however, you are correct. Math is a tool for creating a model of the real world and the two frequently do not overlap precisely. However, recall that in Zeno's time, mathematical truth was philosophical truth and a paradox in math yielded a paradox in reality.
Post a Comment
In addition to comments, please indicate any typographical errors or issues related to this post.
Or you can contact me in private.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.