Tuesday, February 23, 2010

The Arnell Group & PepsiCo

Summary
The Arnell Group is a design company famous for its work with DKNY and Banana Republic (among many others). In the last several years, several of its high-profile projects with PepsiCo have met with derision and consumer outrage.


Blank paper does not count towards the page count of a report.
(Photo: jacqueline-w at Flickr)


Commentary
In 2008, an Arnell Group design document called "Breathtaking" was leaked to the public. The 27-page document was the point of much ridicule as its contents attempt to explain how the proposed Pepsi logo was the ultimate realization of thousands of years of good design. Gems include:
  • conformance with the golden ratio (frequently used in the world of design) [p. 18] and detailed instructions on how to construct the logo using the golden ratio spiral [p. 19]
  • comparison of the logo to the Earth's geodynamo and magnetic fields [p. 21]
  • a 5000+ year timeline of all the "authentic Constitution of Design" (culminating with the Pepsi "Breathtaking" logo) [p. 6]
Apparently, the new logo fulfills the destiny of good design in addition to making Pepsi's logo look similar to other modern logos.

In 2009, the Arnell Group orchestrated the Tropicana orange juice package redesign. (Tropicana is owned by PepsiCo). The design met with amazing backlash from consumers (supposedly, there was a 20% drop in sales) and the existing iconic straw-in-orange design was reinstated.

Meta
What was your reaction when Pepsi changed its logo? What about Tropicana? Other companies?

See Also

3 comments:

Victoria said...

It was ugly. In an Euro/Bauhaus sort of way. For me, it evoked memories of buying orange juice in Europe: pay 8 euros for 12 ounces of overly sweet-yet-watery orange drink. Yeeech.

Jacob said...

Page 8 of the original document has to be BY FAR the MOST ridiculous thing I have seen. Perhaps I need to brush up on my 5000 years of collective human design history.

littlehobbit said...

Ihh. What did I think about the new logo?
Hadn't noticed it. I suppose that makes it a marketing flop. And, ok, that design document is a bunch of horsepucky, but it's marketing. They need to justify their degrees in horsepucky. I expect nothing better. And they rarely dissapoint.

Post a Comment

In addition to comments, please indicate any typographical errors or issues related to this post.
Or you can contact me in private.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.